Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter



    < # Leeds Blogs ? >

    «#Blogging Brits?»

    British Blogs
    I'm a
    Crushed Beetle
    in the
    TTLB Ecosystem

    British Blog Directory.
    XML

    Wednesday, November 30, 2005

    Divided Community

    I've already had cause to refer to the indispensable eleventh chapter of the "Youth's Educator For Home and Society", 1896 edition. Where it ostensibly concentrates on the art of conversation in the 19th Century, I can't help feeling that some of its aperçus will be equally as applicable to the art of blogging in the 21st Century:

    CONVERSATION AN ART.

    PEILE says – "Reason and speech have seemed so inseparable to some that it has been maintained that man would not be man without speech. Hence Shelley's well-known lines:

    " ' He gave man speech, and speech created thought,
    Which is the measure of the universe.' "

    We think there are few who do not ardently desire to become good conversationalists. To be able to hold the attention of a circle of listeners, many of whom are strangers to you, and to make them anxious to hear more from your lips, is a gift that few possess. And yet it lies within the power of all to contribute to the pleasure of any group, by uttering some suggestive thought, which in its turn may set another train of thought in motion, and stimulate to better things.

    The tagline of this blog suggests a new 'new form of imagined community'; simply substitute blogging for speech and its synonyms in the above paragraph, and my case is near to being made for blogging as a new form of conversation.

    I have, however, also had cause to refer to Lampa's study of blogging, in which he refers to the politicised blog as what many people have in mind when they think of blogs, and which enjoys the most credibility. There is a lot of stuff going on in the world right now that I am deeply upset about, but I have to bear in mind what an Educated Youth would do:

    POLITICS AND RELIGION TABOOED.


    Never indulge in conversation that will lead to heated debate in the social circle. Politics and religion should be tabooed, for it is almost impossible to avoid arousing some one's prejudice, or touching some sensitive point. The bitterest quarrels have been the outcome of what at the start was a mere difference of opinion, and as such entitled to a polite forbearance. If two persons can engage in a friendly controversy on any topic, and observe the rules of politeness such an argument is enjoyable to those who list en, for much information can be gained. But it is wiser to maintain silence when either party is so sensitive that a difference of opinion will lead to a loss of temper, and a breach of good manners.


    That being the case, I think I'll keep my more overtly political rants over here in future. Of course, the first entry in the revitalised Dictionary will be about genre, but it should none the less make sense...


    Friday, November 25, 2005

    Genre: Pratchett for Patrician!

    Although blogging is becoming a more and more usual occupation, there remains something of the Geek about it. It's only fitting, then, that (almost) the last of these examinations of genre should touch on Science Fiction and Fantasy. Embarking on this mini-series of postings, I hadn't been fully aware of all the connections between the authors I'd planned to discuss, but it all seems to come together gratifyingly in the Discworld oeuvre of Terry Pratchett. Pratchett, as any fule kno, is one of the country's biggest-selling authors, and yet in many critics' minds is still stuck in the comic fantasy niche.

    Whilst the early Discworld novels are, let's be honest, merely piss-takes of the fantasy genre, (and Bored of the Rings notwithstanding it shouldn't be too difficult to parody sword and sorcery) the series has matured into a very thoughtful meditation on the societal mores we have allowed to develop. Pratchett has realised how well his fantasy world can be used as a mirror for the world we live in, and counter-intuitively presents a powerful hymn to humanity through his cast of assorted dwarfs, werewolves, trolls, women and the like. Vimes - another copper, mark you - embodies this struggle to do the right thing, just like Carella, and they both chime with that need we seem to have, judging from their presence in so many works, for fair-minded authority figures. But Pratchett's touch is sure - see how Vimes appears much less amiable as the establishment heavy keeping a close eye on the free press in 'The Truth'.

    Yes, I did include women in that list of unusual species - the more attentive of you will have noticed how little female presence there is in the previous authors I have forced you to consider. In his more recent works, Pratchett has touched on all kinds of issues affecting our society, but the most interesting idea for me is the way that male intelligence, as represented chiefly by the wizards, and the lack of it, as represented by the aristos and officers, is played off against female wisdom as personified by the witches, Mistress (no longer comfy old Granny) Weatherwax in particular. This theme is particularly apparent in the 'Wee Free Men' books, which I'm looking forward to reading with Ms Dynamite-E-e. I was astounded when a participant accused Pratchett of not having strong female characters in a Guardian Unlimited online Q&A; his answer shows the class you would expect:

    Huh! The Witches have had a regular appearance in DW ever since equal rites, and I would say that practically any woman who appears in the other books in the series tends to play a fairly major role. They may start out demure but they end up Miss Piggy. The two recent books for children are almost entirely female dominated. The character of Susan takes over any novel in which she appears. And if you haven't read Monstrous Regiment then... well, I won't give the plot away, but there's women in it.


    Pratchett is perhaps the best example of a thoughtful writer unfairly dismissed just for sticking to a particular, and in this case particularly unfashionable, genre, rather than writing high literature like, for example, the frankly tedious Salman Rushdie. I'd wager 'Small Gods' has many more salient points to make about religion than were once printed on the smouldering ashes of the Satanic Verses. Returning to Philobiblon's idea that genre is like a comfortable old overcoat, well, yes, it is, and let's enjoy the conventions of those genres. But, please, let's not kid ourselves that high literature is the only form worthy of critical consideration. I hope I've shown there are some great writers and powerful ideas lurking under that overcoat.

    We should be grateful that one of the nation's best-loved and most widely-read authors is able to act as the conscience for the nation. In fact, have you noticed how many phonemes are shared between the words "Pratchett" and "Patrician"? Coincidence? I think not, especially when you realise that the only sound not common to both is 'n'; obviously, Pterry is simply waiting to be nominated as Patrician of the UK. We have never got away from the elective dictatorship, and look where it's got us. Let me, then, be the first to suggest dictatorship by acclamation, and pnominate him.

    *Dec 06 Update: no change to text, but links now provided to the two related posts*





    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:

    Tuesday, November 22, 2005

    Genre: Criminal Masterminds

    Whereas I can accept that O'Brian sought to expand the boundaries of his genre by interrogating the mindset of the early 19th Century military male, rather than simply retreading the path of Hornblower, his meticulous research tends to contract those boundaries again.

    If we turn to crime, then I'd like to make a case for George P. Pelecanos showing us, not a Napoleonic-era naval captain, but the experience of the American working-class male of the late 20th Century, particularly members of the Black and Greek communities. His work is rooted firmly in the conventions of the crime thriller, but I believe his ideas merit a wider audience than just fans of the genre: I have encountered no other author who can evoke the consequences of violence on both perpetrator and victim with such empathy and such conviction. He shows how social policies in America create a situation in which ultra-violent crime often seems like the only viable career option, while never removing responsibility from the individuals involved. The moral vacuity and lack of imagination shown by his villains is truly chilling: petty criminals who are actually much scarier than any cartoon lover of fava beans.

    His flawed heroes draw on the myth of the Frontier Hero as they finally find the courage to face the inevitable and do 'what a man's gotta do', but violence begets violence, as the Job-like sufferings of Dmitri Karras show. All of this to a rich soundtrack of great music (which works in print much better than you might expect) and the roar of big-block American muscle cars. Oh, and as a former twenty-a-day man I've never read anything that evokes the pleasure of smoking more than the stories about Nick Stefanos.

    We lost a great genre writer in Ed Mcbain this summer; he was the inventor, pretty much, of the police procedural, so you fans of Hill Street Blues and its successors now know whom to thank. His 87th Precinct series set out to make the precinct station the hero, with human characters coming and going, although Steve Carella is a constant presence. Carella again draws on the Frontier myth, he's a good man in a difficult position, all the time striving to do what is right in a morally confused world. The scene where he arrests rather than shoots the man who killed his father, when even his partner is urgently whispering "Do it, do it!", stands in stark contrast to the actions of Pelecanos's character Derek Brown during the Washington riots.

    Whilst his books are usually premissed on the conventional notion that the Police are good, and will always get their man - and there is every reason to believe that anyone aiming for popularity and/or sales will need to uphold these reassuring ideas - McBain undermines this genre certainty with his master villain, the Deaf Man. It's not PC of the detectives to identify him just by his disability, but they are unable to pin any other information down about him. The eight-seven's nemesis is never caught (I haven't read the last in the series yet), but fate and/or narrative causality ensure that his scheme never quite comes off.

    Despite these premises, McBain also manages to present the flipside of policing, with Andy Parker and Fat Ollie Weeks exemplars of the corrupt and bigoted among the city's finest. But "Fat Ollie's Book" manages to redeem somewhat the latter, as well as play in a postmodern fashion with the very concept of crime thrillers. So even if critics have kept McBain within his genre, the writer himself has fun, and success, experimenting: he even manages to get Carella embroiled in a ghost story.

    There were 50-odd 87th Precinct books and I've yet to read a duff one, plus others written as McBain, plus yet more written under the pseudonym of Evan Hunter. He did the screenplay for The Birds, you know. There is a lot to get at with McBain; his thoughts on names and the motif of deafness in this series are just two of the many questions that I may come back to on this forum.

    *Dec 06 update: text unchanged, but links provided to two related articles*


    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:

    Saturday, November 19, 2005

    Genre and, Among Others, the Historical Novel

    Just as I am musing on the value of genre as a concept when considering books, along comes Philobiblon with a similar meme theme:

    The framework of genre - be it sci-fi, detective fiction or thrillers - is, when used well, like a comfortable old coat, into which you slip with an anticipatory sigh of comfort.


    It's true, genre creates expectations in the reader, and there is real satisfaction to be derived from watching how those conventions are met, or, indeed, how they are undermined. Philobiblon argues, though, that, all other things being equal, a blend of genres in the one work is liable to be more enjoyable, given the added tension of waiting to see how the conflicting conventions are resolved. Of course, much also depends on the skill of the author: certainly, what little Agatha Christie it has been my eyes' misfortune to pass across makes me think that, however well she may exploit the conventions of the detective novel, I doubt I'll find much satisfaction curled up with her, so to speak.

    The difficulty is, and this is the point that I have been considering recently, that genre all too easily becomes a straitjacket for an author; as soon as a work is pigeon-holed as 'historical', 'fantasy', or whatever, it is no longer taken seriously, regardless of the message(s) of the work itself. I may well go into more detail about any of the authors that follow in later postings, I simply raise them in this small series of postings as examples of what I mean; I'll be looking briefly at, roughly-speaking, three genres in particular over the next few days: historical novels, crime/police procedurals, and fantasy/science fiction.

    If I can start by looking at a famous example (infamous, probably, from the author's viewpoint), I'm not sure myself that the Aubrey-Maturin series deserves to be elevated out of the historical genre: they're superior swashbucklers, to be sure, but the fact that there are many snippets of - untranslated - foreign language, especially Latin or Greek, and a couple of recurring dreadful puns (just to show I can play the game, I do like Aubrey's "Domestique, m'sieur") is not enough, in my book, to justify the claims made for high literature on its behalf. Dean King's fascinating biography of Patrick O'Brian reveals just how much the man himself was obsessed with his literary ranking, and how often he felt it did not reflect his talents.

    In my next instalment, I'll turn to an author who I feel much more successfully explores what it means to be a male in violent times...

    *Dec 06 Update: text unchanged but links now provided to the two related articles*


    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:

    Wednesday, November 16, 2005

    A Rare Point of Etiquette

    I'd never anticipated rare and esoteric points of etiquette might arise when wandering around Ikea. It's not a bad place to take Ms Dynamite-E-e in the cold weather when we need to get out of the house to give her mum a break. Strangely enough, I'd been getting quite a strong feeling that I was going to run into someone I knew tonight, but I hadn't quite figured out who. But then, in soft furnishings, I looked across at some bloke, who at the same time looked at me; bugger me, it's Bones.

    Bones had been a good mate of mine up until about ten or eleven years ago, when he did something unforgivable to his ex-girlfriend, who also was, but in contrast still is, a good friend of mine. I don't want to go into more detail than that on this forum: some of you will know what and who I mean even though I've changed names slightly (and to you I apologise for raking this up again); the rest of you I'll have to ask to trust me when I say that I am not overstating or exaggerating the import of what he did.

    Anyway, Bones comes across to me, all hail-fellow-well-met. At least he had enough sense not to extend his hand. "Hi," he says, "Ian? It's Bones."
    "Yes." I say, non-committally. He knows I don't believe his version of events. His ex had no reason to invent the story - they had split up a good while before, and as amicably as you can do under the circumstances, so it was definitely not a case of her lashing out as part of the fall-out of the split. He knows I don't believe him, because he rang me shortly after the event. I asked a general question about him and his ex, and he immediately, unprompted, started on about the infamous night. He couldn't explain that, or the night itself, at all.

    I don't know what he expects me to do or say, and to be honest, I don't know myself. He starts to blurt out a torrent of small-talk questions and comments: "That your little one?"; "I saw your brother the other week."; "I'm working, doing a bit of cooking at the Bull and Shite."; and so on. To this flow of inanity, I simply grunt, or echo "Are you?", "Did you?". My intonation falls with each question. I am blatantly not interested in the conversation, I want to tell him so, but can't find a gap in the drip feed. He even mentions that he sees his ex from time to time - I'm dumbfounded that he has the gall to imply that she's happy to see him, whereas my recollection of what she told me was that it was one chance unpleasant encounter at a nightclub door. Whatever else Bones might be, though, he's not a thick individual. He can tell the encounter isn't going his way, and that if I do have time to get my thoughts together, anything I do say won't cover him in glory. So he fires out "See you later," and steps off, smartish.

    Well, fine. As I say, he's bright enough to realise what my obvious blanking of him means. I don't need to spell it out for his benefit. But... but. I can't help feeling I needed to spell it out for my own benefit: I needed to tell him in plain, open speech that he's beneath my contempt, rather than just assume he's capable of inferring it for himself. I needed to assert aloud that I reject that sort of deed, that sort of individual who perpetrates it. I needed to tell him to stop fucking pretending nothing's wrong between us. I didn't. What's worse is that a couple of minutes later his girlfriend comes stalking up to me, tells me "You shouldn't believe every rumour you hear. It's not nice, and it's not kind," spins round while my jaw hits the floor, and stalks off again before I can even summon up the small wit to tell her "Oh, fuck off!", never mind find a more coherent response.

    Who is she to tell me what and how to think? How does she know where I get my information from, and how I come to my conclusions? Bones didn't have time to tell her exactly how I fitted into his biography, and I'm not such a crashing solipsist as to imagine he would have mentioned me earlier. No, I reckon she saw me blanking her boyfriend and must have assumed I'd just heard some gossip from fourth-hand. Now, I can sympathise to a certain extent - if I were a woman, I can imagine myself making a big effort not to believe that my partner was capable of such acts. Her interjection shows she knew of the incident, even if she did choose to dismiss it as rumour.

    There have been a few musical references already in the short life of this blog, and I have a tune in my head just now that, funnily enough, I listened to quite a lot around the time when I was still friendly with Bones. It's New Model Army's The Hunt, the chorus runs:

    No police, no summons, no courts of law.
    No proper procedures, no rules of war.
    No mitigating circumstance.
    No lawyers' fees, no second chance.


    It never did go to court, for a whole host of reasons. There were enough offers of summary justice around at the time but Bones' ex asked for it not to happen. At that time, and for a long while afterwards, I didn't understand that stance. But now, I'm closer to understanding; a good kicking would have been too easy for him: he'd have taken it, licked his wounds, and then felt that the slate was clean. Whereas, now, that debt to society is still unpaid - I doubt it can ever be otherwise - and he is still, rightly, anathematised.

    So, I'm berating myself for choosing dumb insolence rather than speaking up for what I believe. It's a little better than the response I might have had up until eighteen months or so ago, when I would swallow quite a lot rather than risk an open confrontation, but it will probably eat away at me for a good while. Mind you, I take some small solace from the knowledge that his act is branded into him: everywhere he goes where people know him (and he's chosen to return to this area), his girlfriend's reaction shows that everyone has heard of what he did. Every time he meets someone from his past, the first thing that will come to both minds is the knowledge of what he did. I know that he knows he carries a stain on his character he will never erase: however he has justified it to himself, he knows that it's neither forgotten nor forgiven. No second chance; no, not for that.

    Still, if anyone has a copy of Debrett's hanging around or something, maybe you could say what the done thing is in such encounters?

    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:
    Ignore this, it's just a tag:

    Saturday, November 12, 2005

    Retrospective Interaction

    You come through the doors and down the steps knowing that you've done a good morning's work. The tang of the cold air hits you, awakening you from the slight torpor induced by the library. The sky is clear and blue; there's enough wind to set the leaves shifting restlessly, but not so much as to make riding a chore. You strap on your helmet as you head for the bike, and decide the sun is bright enough to warrant sunglasses, which means you don't have to fiddle with your goggles. You reach the bike, put your bag in the topbox, pull out the choke not all the way, and Boanerges fires up willingly.

    You stand up as you go over the speed bumps, listening to make sure you only hear the usual rattles. The poor guy who's copped the weekend shift in the gatehouse doesn't respond to your nod and grin as you go past, but then, you probably wouldn't either if the tables were turned. It's maybe only then you remember the blog entry you read the other night about riding in the rain, and you decide to pay more conscious attention to the impressions of your ride. Too often, you're concentrating on what will need doing when you get home, or what to get people for Christmas, or the crassness of the consumer society we live in, Santa's grottoes springing up like poisonous fungus the day after bonfire night - corporate mushrooms, all magic removed, guaranteed. Sure, you smell the smoke from the cigarette on the lips of the guy waiting to cross; you hear the constantly changing burble or roar of the engine, you see the colours of the autumn leaves against the pale blue, you feel, even through your winter gloves, the road texture change as the bars gently move in your hands, but none of it endures past the moment of its realisation. There is a passive awareness, a Zen acceptance that these things are, and then are not.

    You pull off the main road, out of the slowly moving stream of cars, and as you lean the bike into the turn, you open the throttle, maybe more than you should in a 30 zone, but it's a wide, empty road, and no obstructions to conceal sudden hazards. And on a day like this, a ride like this, it would be a crime against your own humanity if you didn't. All these considerations barely register as you accelerate, but it's enough for you to know that the calculations are constantly being recalibrated.

    As you rejoin the next major route, you consider the driver in front. Granted, it's not necessarily his choice to be plodding along at 30, but you pity his isolated existence, removed from the environment. The air is fresh on your cheeks. All he can feel is the dry sterile air from his heater as he looks out at the picture nicely framed by the windscreen surround. All he can hear is the gibbering inanity of the radio. He may as well be at home, watching the telly. You're only driving home, but there is pleasure, deep pleasure, in the journey itself, not just your anticipation of your destination.

    At the top of the hill, there's a right onto the dual carriageway; if you're lucky, the lights on the pelican crossing just after will be green, so you can open the throttle more as you come through the turn, knowing that the rear tyre will just grip even more eagerly. As the bike straightens, you again think of that blog entry; you've valued your dignity, or your backache, too much to ever tuck in properly behind the vestigial fairing, but now you do. There is, as promised, a quieter pocket of air, and you reach high speeds more quickly than normally, or is that just a trick of the pose? But your hold on the bars has changed, the steering seems less positive, and, perversely, you miss the familiar wind blast. So it's back to sitting up straighter, you become an airbrake as you slow to pass the speed camera, then wind it on again for the long sweeping bends at the bottom of the hill and the climb up the next.

    The second camera has gone, missing, presumed lost to an irate driver, so you wind on some more up the hill. Boanerges revs tirelessly. The incongruous memory you have, of your Russian teacher's sound effects for an act you didn't expect him to refer to - thank the gods it was only son and not lumiere - is prompted by the wind whipping your cheeks. Not for the first time, you reflect on whether an open face helmet is really appropriate for a large motorcycle. You know, though, that if anything happens at this speed, it won't matter what you're wearing on your head: "This helmet may not provide protection against all possible impacts." You also know that like this you are more connected, safer, more aware of what's going on. After all, your full face lid also frames the world into a widescreen projection - letter box format. You need it on the M62, on the tops, in the rain, preparing for the side winds to hit again once you pass that next truck, but round town you need the advantage of every sense being in play.

    Approaching the roundabout, there'll be space to filter down the side; you just know that car will cut across to the outside with no signalling. Did he know you were coming up alongside? The car at the front is moving, you glance, it's safe, wind on past, the bike leans left then right then left again. More throttle, straighten up, more throttle... Thinking about it, you know you must have been counter-steering and shifting your weight first one side then the other, but you have to think to know that you did. At the next big roundabout the lights are just changing in your favour, you again subtly shift and the bike leans in response to your inputs; you've hit the traffic light sequence just right, and move on smoothly round, shifting gear as the revs rise.

    All too soon, you're home, but today at least you're wise enough to realise the folly in contriving another destination. You grin ruefully as you acknowledge that thought and put your bike in the garage. As you close the padlock, turn, and walk down the driveway, the air is fresh; you hear how the crunch of the gravel is muted by the fallen leaves, and realise how well these complement the red Leeds brickwork glowing in the autumn sunlight. Just your usual commute.

    Thursday, November 10, 2005

    Punishing schedule

    PUNS ARE VULGAR.

    A pun occasionally can be forgiven, in good society, but the man or woman who makes a pun on every other word, is a terrible nuisance, and the soul will rise up in arms against them. The fashion of punning dates from the times of the early Greeks, but its age does not entitle it to veneration. Their chief objection is that they continually break in on agreeable conversation, and divert the mind from the subject. A punster has no regard for the most sacred and dear feelings of the heart, and would as readily play upon words at a funeral as at a wedding.


    My apologies, then, for lowering the tone.

    Wednesday, November 09, 2005

    Uncle Eric, is that you?

    Who's that handsome chap in the uniform?

    burn, baby, burn!

    No, sorry, wrong image: that's me, finally revealed in my secret identity as a Red Army Major, coming to a TV screen near you soon-ish, in a tense but poorly-scripted scene of impending nuclear doom. And it's me with my finger on the button - 'scuse me a second [grabs cat, places on lap, strokes] - Mwah-hah-hah-hah-hah-ha!

    Ahem. In fact, it's the handsome chap in the uniform on the dustjacket of this book that intrigues me:

    but there aren't any romantics in our branch of the family, never mind any Erics

    He's the spit of my father in his younger days. The unknown soldier shares my surname, but his first name is Eric. We know the names of my paternal great-grandfather's brothers, who would have been of an age to fight in the First World War, poor sods, but none of them was an Eric. A long-lost relative, maybe. Watch this space. Thanks to Diane who sent me the information.

    Monday, November 07, 2005

    Imagined originality

    Well, I don't know. You think that you have this amazing insight into how a study of nation-building can also be applied to blogging, only to find that people have got there before you:
    for the vast majority of users who blog casually, infrequently, and for the benefit of their real-world friends and family, the blogosphere does not exist in the ethereal, hyperlinked connections that bind blogs to one another; rather, it resides in the mind of the individual blogger as an online imagined community resulting from the shared experience of instant publishing.
    I suppose it's nice, though, to have your ideas supported by an academic study. Strangely, I find that my previous effort seems to have, from Lampa's point of view, more potential for credibility among the blogging cognoscenti, but, frankly, I'm happier that this effort will have more relevance to my immediate reality, aka, for the vegetarians in the audience, 'meatspace'; the contradiction, of course, is that in Lampa's framework I am, like, conceptually, a teenage girl; I'm not sure I've ever had call to say that of myself before. Whatever.

    Saturday, November 05, 2005

    The Pitter-Patter of Tiny Cossack Feet

    Russian Cossacks Ordered To Have More Children To Boost Population
    Mayak Radio
    November 3, 2005

    (Presenter) The Great Host of Don Cossacks will now engage in boosting the population. The Cossacks' families are now obliged to have at least five children. Lina Bulatova has details.

    (Correspondent) The order that produced quite a stir had in fact been issued by Sergey Sennik, the leader of the Azov Cossack community. The order reads as follows: Cossacks with families should have as many children as possible, at least five.

    Sergey Sennik believes that the conditions for raising children are there. Sennik has given (Cossacks) a year to fulfil the order. After this Cossack families will be obliged to have a child every two years. The best families will be paid benefits of R1,000.

    Time will show what results the Azov initiative will bring. Meanwhile, the young Cossack leader Sergey Sennik has set an even higher standard for himself. He intends to have seven children. Although at present he is not even married.


    [Via Johnson's Russia List e-mail bulletin 9287]

    Friday, November 04, 2005

    Cheesy Tunes

    Monty Python once had a sketch involving a mouse organ, which if memory serves was played with a couple of mallets to get the squeaks. Lot of effort to go to for the sake of a pun like that, which is rich, coming from me, I know (incidentally, ask me about my wasp jokes, go on, I dare you). However, as someone who once had a pet mouse - champagne and tan - that won second prize in a pet show (incidentally, don't ask me how many other candidates there were in her category), and therefore can claim to having once been a mouse fancier, I was delighted to read that, apparently, mice can sing. It should come as no surprise, it's been known for at least a century that mice can waltz. There are two clips on the Guardian site, but here's a clip that really displays the musicality of the singing (better quality than those on the Guardian site, but might take a while on dial-up).